MILD REGIME FIXING FOR AN INITIAL ACCOMPLISHMENT OF RESTRICTIVE PENALTY OF FREEDOM

Authors

  • Laura Costa
  • Poliana Costa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/revistadaesmesc.v27i33.p257

Keywords:

Penalties purposes, Restrictive penalty of freedom, Prison system, Desocialization, Necessity and sufficiency of the penalty, Mild regime of sentence accomplishment (open regime)

Abstract

The present study presents a brief analysis on the possibility of fixing the initial open regime fulfilling the restrictive penalty of freedom, on the hypothesis where a legal regime does not appear to be necessary to attend disapproval and crime prevention. Firstly, the disapproval and crime prevention purposes are presented, along with the theory adopted by the Brazilian ordering, and the initial open regime fixing criteria for penalties accomplishment. With the theoretical basis settled, the next considerations are about the general view of the contemporary prison system, the defendant’s dignity violation, and the incapacity to attempt the penalty resocialization purposes. The fixing authorizers’ criteria for a severer regime than the legal one are analyzed, aiming to understand if the same logic authorizes a mild regime. In the end, deliberations about the necessity and sufficiency of the penalty are made, as well as the propositions for a criterion for fixing the mild regime.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Laura Costa

Graduada em Direito pelo Complexo de Ensino Superior de Santa Catarina (Cesusc). Atualmente é advogada, inscrita na OAB/SC n. 50.96

Poliana Costa

Graduada em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) e especialista em Direito Público e em Prática Jurídica pela Universidade Regional de Blumenau (Furb). Atualmente desempenha a função de Técnica Judiciária Auxiliar na Diretoria-Geral Judiciária no Tribunal de Justiça de Santa Catarina

Published

2020-11-11

Issue

Section

ARTIGOS